Ross
You're using the FY30A as an independent camera stabilizer?
Bart
Ross
You're using the FY30A as an independent camera stabilizer?
As for the OP CC, why is the board hard coded to require five inputs? Is that what the hang up is to making it a simple two axis camera stabilizer? I'm just asking, not trying to stir the pot.
Bart
Its just the way they have done it, not 100% sure why, but I believe its first and foremost a flight controlled, and requires the 5inputs to decide that the signals its reciving are valid
Yea, pretty much that should work, I played around for a while but was never happyso it sounds like if it has five inputs from a receiver but only outputs signals to two servos then it's happy with that arrangement and could maybe be used on a camera plate?
Maybe I'm not understanding. Why would you need axis lock for camera stabilization?Yea, pretty much that should work, I played around for a while but was never happy
Now with axis lock available, it could be quite a good solution
Maybe I'm not understanding. Why would you need axis lock for camera stabilization?
Couldn't you use the standard camera stabilization module and reverse the throws on the servos if necessary?
thanks for the input Mat. How's business?
Here's the problem (IMHO, as I see it), with the MK camera stabilization the FC seems to lose track of what would be horizontal for the camera and during periods of prolonged sideways flying one must accept that the horizon won't be level.
Also, with a three axis mount, pitch and roll stability are lost once you pan the camera left or right from straight ahead. So, having the camera stabilizer resident on the camera plate itself would make the stabilized camera independent of the stabilized helicopter. If the camera stabilizer were effective enough, in theory, the helicopter could be flown sideways, backwards, however and the camera mount would be seeking level in roll and stabilized at whatever tilt has been input by the camera operator and it would all be based on the movement of the camera and not the heli.
Unless flight controls are issuing stabilization commands based on where the helicopter is going to be in a fraction of a second into the future in an attempt to preempt what the gyros may sense, i can't see how stabilizing the camera itself could be bad, or impossible for the CC to figure out.