Bartman
Welcome to MultiRotorForums.com!!
I had a discussion with DJ of PhotoShip One today and I asked him about some of the challenges involved in making the multi-rotor platform the best aerial video platform possible. He really does understand the problems and has tried a lot of different things to make improvements but there are still barriers.
My question for the forums is this; What is most important for an aerial mount?
Is most AP work done while stationary or near stationary?
Is the ability to shoot video while flying at higher speeds really a necessary design goal?
What comes first for you, the stability of the camera or the maneuverability of the multi-rotor?
I suggested a camera mount design in another thread but DJ pointed out it's impractical at higher speeds due to the centrifugal forces and accelerations involved. I'm doing still photography so this stuff is above my paygrade but I thought I'd try to start the conversation rolling.
Thanks,
Bart
My question for the forums is this; What is most important for an aerial mount?
Is most AP work done while stationary or near stationary?
Is the ability to shoot video while flying at higher speeds really a necessary design goal?
What comes first for you, the stability of the camera or the maneuverability of the multi-rotor?
I suggested a camera mount design in another thread but DJ pointed out it's impractical at higher speeds due to the centrifugal forces and accelerations involved. I'm doing still photography so this stuff is above my paygrade but I thought I'd try to start the conversation rolling.
Thanks,
Bart