Hello all
Just thinking, could you not use a small quad just set to hover at say 400ft above you to act as a fpv relay to your main uav?
This would mean much greater LOS ranges without having to worry about stronger tx
anyone tried it?
Ben
Hello all
Just thinking, could you not use a small quad just set to hover at say 400ft above you to act as a fpv relay to your main uav?
This would mean much greater LOS ranges without having to worry about stronger tx
anyone tried it?
Ben
Would it really make that big of a difference? Seems the whole sky is littered with interference. Like Ken said, just choose a better frequency.
There are a few ways to do this. You will need at least a twisted pair of insulated wires from the balloon. At the balloon you would have to have an FPV receiver (like you would have on the ground) and a line amplifier/impedance matcher like the one described by TEXAS instruments at: http://www.ti.com/lit/an/snoa422b/snoa422b.pdf
Remember also, that the true horizon (as opposed to the actual horizon to the trees etc.) is a function of:
d (Km to horizon) is approx 3.75 x sq. root of observer's height in meters. Therefor d=3miles for h=6ft, d=24mi for h=330 ft, & d=69mi for h=2717ft (at the coast).
Just some thoughts ...
How bout the radio signal? Is it as important to be high too?
The higher you are, generally speaking, the longer your radio signal will be received and the lower you are the exact opposite. You have a better chance at 1 mile away and 500 feet up than you do at 1 mile away and 5 feet off the ground of receiving a signal.
Yah but I mean whats the purpose of having high vrx antenna if you're just sitting low with your uhf radio. Youll see the video but you wont be able to control it right?
This has all got be to flight time dependent, what quad is going to fly for miles anyway.. Oh and I thought in most countries flying beyond line of sight was a no no.
I here of people flying planes miles and miles no problem BUT one day with all this advanced technology easily available to fly further and further there is going to be a disaster. The CAA over here in the UK now have a team on the hunt for people to prosecute after a few near misses with commercial and recreational full size aircraft.
Think long and hard before flying FPV BLOS and if you are going to do it anyway at least check for NOTAMS in the area you are going to fly and just remember its not only our hobby and your freedom you are jeopardising but its also other peoples lives.
Slight rant over.
@helloman, errr the tread is called 'FPV relay idea' oh and by the way no matter where you fly UK or anywhere if you cause an incident you will be held responsible. Yes we all know the technology is there to do it but its about responsibility. Desert, mountains, local parks it makes no odds, once you don your FPV goggles your peripheral vision is gone, your awareness of what is around you 500m out has gone, you do not know what is behind, below, above left or right.
Guess this is a matter of opinion but as far as I am concerned FPV should only be used with a observer ALWAYS keeping the craft in site and in contact with the pilot to make him aware of what the immersed pilot may not be aware of.
Example, only a couple of days ago I was working LOS. I had check the NOTAMS in the area I was operating and was perfectly clear to work LOS and to an altitude of 400ft. I carried out the flight and landed, as I landed I heard a plane, it was a Army C130 flying down the Loch at 200ft not 300ft from my take off position. This totally freaked me out. I rang the local ATC and was told they do that now and again! Now you are 1km out FPV and even though you think you are not going to cause any problem to anyone how do you really know. The answer is you don't, you could cause a massive problem.
Anyhow I dont agree with FPV flight BLOS of an observer...so thats me done.
Dave