Solder Monkey
New Member
Hi all,
I'm planning a QAV250 build and was thinking of using an old Naza-M lite & GPS I have knocking around.
I like the idea of having GPS as an 'insurance policy' so the quad will hold its position and/or return to home in the event of loss of FPV signal, loss of control signal or loss of visuals.
I've seen threads on other forums suggesting that the Naza would be sluggish compared to Naze32 or CC3D, but would it really be that different compared to Naza in manual mode or with fast gain settings?
If I decide not to use the Naza, what are the main differences between Naze32 and Cc3D, and which should I go for?
Cheers guys!
I'm planning a QAV250 build and was thinking of using an old Naza-M lite & GPS I have knocking around.
I like the idea of having GPS as an 'insurance policy' so the quad will hold its position and/or return to home in the event of loss of FPV signal, loss of control signal or loss of visuals.
I've seen threads on other forums suggesting that the Naza would be sluggish compared to Naze32 or CC3D, but would it really be that different compared to Naza in manual mode or with fast gain settings?
If I decide not to use the Naza, what are the main differences between Naze32 and Cc3D, and which should I go for?
Cheers guys!