Kloner is right, of course, c is a measurement of ir. A perfectionist, like our dear friend Kloner, expects the best. If you run high output motors that take a high demand, then I would follow this example myself, and do with my srh fleet, which are all hopped up to the max.
My point being, these are not that type of application. These is even less demanding than an electric plane motor.
Myself, I had some high c motors I used in the beginning. When I replaced them I never noticed a difference at all in performance.
In fact, the only time I had a battery problem it was with a 65c battery.
Now, if I had an expensive CarbonCore or such, an $800 gimbal throwing up a $$$ camera, then deffinately, I would use the best high c rated battery I could.
That's not what I have though. Not saying that what I have doesn't deserve the best, just there is a line out there somewhere.
The biggest concern, for me at least, is what Kloner stated about age of batterys. I've turned into a Nano-Tec believer. Great batterys, great price, great quality. Don't feel bad when one gets taco'd.
Guess if I was to fly miles out over the ocean, like somebody I know, miles out over a river bouncing off sand bars or a desert, I would want to ensure everything it spot on, too.
All great advise and info! Consider all and judge for yourself.
Kloner, hope the leg is doing better, buddy!