Search results

It is provided by Euro USC Did my mail get spammed?

"This part is confusing me - I can find nothing in the CAA regs detailing the requirement to have an RTH facility. Indeed, the entire CAA Case/Mode/Class structure (as laid out in CAP722) seems to be ignored (and even contradicted) by EuroUSC." Heres lies the conundrum Jess, as CAP722 also...

Swisser, the several craft, if outlined in the Ops manual, is limited to 2 per flight test according to my latest correspondence. There is currently one accredited school to carry out flight training, none as far I know for ground schooling. I think the point here is that the accredited school...

Ross, all the info is on the Euro USC website in PDF's There is a template for the ops manual on the CAA website and also EuroUSC provide one as well as checklist templates. Groundschool does not really consist of much, again the syllabus is on PDF.

Ross you would have to schedule and complete the ground school first. For pt2, the flight test, its not just a matter of turning up and proving to their examiner you can handle a heli, they want to review your ops manual and safety case in advance then I gather its an operational assessment...

Just as a sidenote, Euro USC no longer have scheduled flight test days so they are all Adhoc. however the price for an adhoc test is now £350+vat not £500+vat as it was previously even if you are only a party of one. Still pricey I know.

Jes, my interpretation from the revised CAP722 was that a type or class structure had been developed. However I was told directly by Euro USC that this was a mistake, or mis-representation by the CAA, of the situation where certification is only valid for the system you have been tested on...

Andy, this is something I feel very strongly about, It could actually be a show stopper for me and I'm sure many others, if I have to haul *** down south and fork out another wedge for a retest every time I upgrade something. I also find it ludicrous that the test has to be done with...

Pretty sure its a standalone board Dave, as if you have the main HF FC it contains the Gimbal control, so you wouldnt need the Gimbal board. I think it performs the same, anybody confirm?

A good deal on a clover leaf and planar pair here: http://www.uavshop.co.uk/catalog/index.php?cPath=53

Going way off topic here but on the conspiracy note, this struck a nerve with me. could be BS of course!

About £180...roughly $300 I guess.

Not sure,, I see that they are also selling the cinestar range. its not been unknown for the chinese to copy the odd item.

I use an APM2, its hard to give a fair appraisal of it without a very good working knowledge of it, my initial view is that its alt and pos'n hold is not as locked in as naza, I think Naza GPS lock is awesome. Ive had it locked in solid in 30kt winds. I just think Naza is a bit wobbly though...

Thanks guys, will get in touch with Torberry, liking the sound of crimped connectors.

Anyone using conformal coatings on power distribution boards? Any recommendations? Cheers Steve

Thats the one!!

No...... that ebay one was rpsma to rpsma!!

beat me to it lol :tennis:

http://www.simplesolutions-uk.com/products/rf/connectors/linx-rp-sma-male-rp-sma-female-right-angle-adaptor